Understanding Ballistic & Forced Entry Protection
- Louis
- Jul 29
- 5 min read

Why Certified, Engineered Security Matters
It’s common to hear terms like “bullet-proof” or “burglar-proof” used loosely when describing doors or windows. But in reality, there is no such thing as completely impervious protection—only tested, certified levels of resistance matched to realistic threats.
Whether you're safeguarding your home during civil unrest or designing a fortified facility for sensitive assets, the right security solution depends on more than just thick steel. It requires validated performance to withstand real-world attacks—delivered through tested products designed to meet international standards like EN 1522 and EN 1627–1630.
This article provides a breakdown of what these resistance ratings mean, how they’re tested, and how to match them to real-life threat scenarios. We also explain how these standards apply to doors —the most common (and weakest) points of entry—and why choosing certified solutions is essential.
What Do EN Ratings Actually Mean?
Forced Entry Resistance – EN 1627–1630 (RC Ratings)
EN 1627 outlines the classification of burglar resistance for doors, windows, grilles and shutters. It is part of a suite of standards (EN 1627 to EN 1630) used to determine how long and with what tools a product can withstand a break-in attempt.
Testing involves:
Static Load Tests (EN 1628): Simulates brute force from kicks, shoulder barges, or bodyweight using hydraulic rams and jigs.
Dynamic Load Tests (EN 1629): Involves a 30kg steel ram dropped from increasing heights to replicate blunt force impact.
Manual Attack Tests (EN 1630): Performed by trained professionals using specific toolsets for each RC level. Tools include screwdrivers, pry bars, crowbars, hammers, drills, grinders and saws—applied in defined sequences over a set period of active attack time.
Here’s a simplified breakdown of the RC levels:
In real-world incidents, most attackers expect visible progress within a couple of minutes. If doors resist tools they brought (e.g. a pry bar or hammer), they often abandon the attempt—especially if noise or alarms increase the risk of discovery.
Important Note: EN 1630 tests only consider the tools and attack time specified. A product certified to RC4 will not necessarily withstand tools from an RC5 or RC6 test. Certification must match your specific threat profile.
Ballistic Resistance – EN 1522 (FB Ratings)
EN 1522 defines ballistic (bullet) protection for windows, doors, and shutters under controlled test conditions. Doors are tested as a complete system—including leaf, frame, hinges and locks—to ensure real-world reliability.
Ballistic protection is categorised from FB1 to FB7, based on the calibre, energy and velocity of the rounds used:
Choosing the Right Protection Level
We strongly recommend conducting a threat-based risk assessment to define the necessary protection class for your situation. The highest threat level from any realistic scenario should inform the specification of your secure door.
1. Target Profile
What are you protecting?
Life Safety: Family members, VIPs, at-risk individuals
Valuables: Cash, precious metals, IP, crypto wallets
Infrastructure: Servers, secure comms, surveillance
2. Threat Actor Profile
Examples of various potential threats are given in the table below. These should be used as guidelines only, and adapted to the specific circumstances.
3. Response Time Planning
Onsite Security: Immediate deterrent
Private Response Team: 10–15 minutes
Police (Urban): 15–30+ minutes
Police (Regional/Rural): 30–60+ minutes
Even low-level resistance (RC3–RC4) will stop most attackers using household tools. Determined attackers may persist, but audible alarms and visible delay often force retreat.
4. Site-Specific Considerations
CCTV, early warning systems
Whether evacuation is possible or shelter is required
Line-of-sight to sniper-prone areas
Safe room proximity to bedrooms or exits
5. Human Factors
Accessibility for children, elderly, or disabled
Internal mechanical override
Locking method: biometric, keypad, remote control
Redundant power and ventilation
Threat Scenarios: Real-World Examples
Civil Unrest
Scenario: Post-disaster, power outages, supply shortages and panic lead to widespread looting and violent home invasions. A family in a suburban area seeks a safe fallback room if intruders breach the house.
Likely tools: Hammers, axes, pry bars
No firearms or low-calibre handguns only (Australia-specific)
Help may not come for hours with police and emergency services overstretched or unable to respond to individual callouts
Recommended Specification:
Door: RC4 (optional FB4 for reassurance)
Locks: Motorised with manual override
Public Figure – Lone Attacker
Scenario: A well-known online personality and commentator receives credible threats and lives alone in a rural property with delayed police response.
Threat: A lone gunman with a scoped hunting rifle
Tools: Minimal (blunt force and small tools)
Response: 30+ minutes likely
Recommended Specification:
Door: RC2 + FB6 (sniper resistance)
Windows: FB6 glazing in office/bedroom
Embassy Compound – Coordinated Assault
Scenario: A Western embassy in a geopolitically unstable region faces the risk of a complex militant assault with automatic weapons, explosives, and coordinated breaching tactics.
Attackers: 5–20 militants with rifles, grenades, IEDs
Response: 30–60+ minutes
Objective: Capture and personnel, destruction, propaganda
Recommended Specification:
Door: RC6 + FB7, blast-rated
Walls: Ballistic armouring to FB6/FB7
Hybrid & Custom Solutions
We offer engineered, certified systems that combine RC5+, FB6+ and blast resistance into a single assembly. These are ideal for embassies, data centres, military contractors and ultra-high-risk environments.
Need to specify a secure room or hardened facility?
We provide full-spectrum support—from design consultation and threat assessment through to provision of certified systems. All products are backed by international standards.




Comments